[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":27},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sitca_invest-115-1-021":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":22},"sitca_invest","投信投顧業務員資格測驗——證券投資與財務分析","c7",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":19,"explanation":20,"difficulty":21},"sitca_invest-115-1-021","115-1",21,"某投資人在前一季的期貨交易中連續虧損，之後對任何高風險投資都變得極度謹慎，甚至連報酬穩定的商品也不敢投入。這種在經歷損失後對風險產生過度畏懼的行為，最能以哪一種行為財務理論解釋？",[13,14,15,16],"後悔規避(regret aversion)","賭資效應(house money effect)","蛇咬效應(snake-bite effect)","扳平效果(break-even effect)",2,"效率市場假說",1,"(C) 對:蛇咬效應(snake-bite effect)指投資人一旦被虧損「咬」過,便對風險產生過度畏懼,連風險合理、報酬穩定的標的也不敢碰,風險趨避程度暫時性大幅提高,正符合題意。(A) 後悔規避是因害怕日後懊悔而遲遲不做決策或不願認賠;(B) 賭資效應指用「贏來的錢」時反而更敢冒險;(D) 扳平效果指虧損後急於加碼翻本,反而更愛冒險,兩者皆與題意的畏懼相反。","medium",[23],{"id":24,"question":25,"qno":26},"sitca_invest-115-2-019","有關動能投資策略(Momentum Investment Strategy)與反向投資策略(Contrarian Investment Strategy)之敘述，何者「正確」？甲.買賣策略相同；乙.均假設市場不具效率；丙.均強調基本分析",19,1787293970255]